Nobody wants to wait for shipping when the exam date is already circled on the calendar. Order the CAP practice questions from PracticeVCE and the The SecOps Group Certified AppSec Practitioner material lands in your inbox within a minute of payment, ready to download, print, and study.
The SecOps Group CAP Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Authentication and Session Management | - Password Security - Session Security |
| Cryptographic Failures | |
| Secure Coding Practices | |
| Cross-Site Scripting | |
| OWASP Top 10 | |
| Security Misconfigurations | |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery | |
| Access Control Vulnerabilities | |
| Defense-in-Depth Measures | |
| XML External Entity Attack | |
| SQL Injection | |
| Input Validation Mechanisms | - Blacklisting - Whitelisting |
CAP Exam Questions, Answered
Yes. A free PDF demo is available so you can review the question quality and format before you pay anything. And once you do purchase, your The SecOps Group Certified AppSec Practitioner material includes 365 days of free updates — if that update period expires, you can extend it later at a 50% discount from your member zone.
The CAP exam includes 60 questions, and you have 60 minutes to complete them. That makes pacing a real part of the challenge. Before test day, work out roughly how much time you can afford per question, get used to flagging a hard item and coming back to it instead of burning five minutes on one answer, and run at least a couple of full timed sessions in the PracticeVCE test engine so the clock feels familiar when it counts.
The official blueprint divides the The SecOps Group Certified AppSec Practitioner into 12 domains. The main areas include Cross-Site Scripting, Authentication and Session Management, Security Misconfigurations. Each domain breaks down into its own subtopics, so scroll up to the complete exam outline above before you plan your study schedule.
Basic theoretical and practical knowledge of application security concepts, OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, security best practices, and common exploitation techniques is recommended. Certification vendors do adjust these requirements from time to time, so we recommend confirming the current criteria on the official exam page — official CAP exam information before you register.
The CAP exam is the official test you need to pass to earn the AppSec Practitioner certification at the Entry Level level. Passing it validates your skills to employers, and for many IT professionals it is a direct step toward better roles and better pay. It also connects to related credentials such as Certified Application Security Practitioner, Certified AppSec Pentester (CAPen), so it is worth understanding where this exam sits on your certification path.
The passing score for the CAP exam is 60%, and the official registration fee is $100. One thing candidates often overlook: if you do not pass, a retake means paying that fee again in full. It is a strong argument for drilling with the 60 practice questions from PracticeVCE until your mock scores sit comfortably above the bar before you book a seat.
If you take the corresponding CAP exam within 60 days of purchase and do not pass, you can apply for a full refund under our 100% Money Back Guarantee. Send us a scanned copy of your exam enrollment slip together with your official Score Report PDF within 2 days of taking the exam, and we will process the claim within 7 days. Please note the conditions: sitting the exam within 3 days of purchase does not qualify, the candidate name on the exam record must match the payer's name, and free materials, downloaded-but-never-taken exams, and expired orders are excluded. If you would rather not take a refund, you can exchange your order for two other exam products of equal value at no cost and keep the update service on your original purchase. Delivery itself is instant: the files are available for download right after payment and also reach your mailbox within a minute — contact our customer service team if nothing arrives within 2 hours. There is no limit on how many computers you may install the material on.
The SecOps Group Certified AppSec Practitioner Sample Questions:
Based on the below HTTP request, which of the following statements is correct?
POST /changepassword HTTP/2
Host: example.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:107.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/107.0 Sec-Fetch-Dest: document Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin Cookie: JSESSIONID=38RB5ECV10785B53AF29816E92E2E50 Content-Length: 95 new_password=usher!@22&confirm_password=usher!@22
- A. The change password feature uses basic authorization
- B. The change password feature does not validate the user
- C. All of the above
- D. The change password feature is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery attack
Correct Answer: D 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for PracticeVCE members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
In the screenshot below, an attacker is attempting to exploit which vulnerability?
POST /dashboard HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) rv:107.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/107.0 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-GB,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1 Sec-Fetch-Dest: document Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate Sec-Fetch-Site: none Sec-Fetch-User: ?1 Cookie: JSESSIONID=7576572ce164646de967c759643d53031 Te: trailers Connection: keep-alive Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: 81 xml_foo=<ENTITY example SYSTEM "file:///etc/passwd">]><foo>&example;</foo>
<!DOCTYPE foo [<!ENTITY example SYSTEM "file:///etc/passwd">]><foo>&example;</foo>
<foo>&example;</foo>
<title>Project Meeting</title>
<time>1200</time>
<location>changed example</location>
</body>
- A. Server Side Template Injection
- B. Path Traversal Attack
- C. XML Bomb Attack
- D. XML External Entity Attack
Correct Answer: D 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for PracticeVCE members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
In the screenshot below, an attacker is attempting to exploit which vulnerability?
Request
POST /dashboard/userdata HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) Firefox/107.0
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-GB,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1 Sec-Fetch-Dest: document Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate Sec-Fetch-Site: none Sec-Fetch-User: ?1 Cookie: JSESSIONID=7576572ce167b5634ie646de967c759643d53031 Te: trailers Connection: keep-alive Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: 36 useragent=http://127.0.0.1/admin PrettyRaw | Hex | php | curl | ln | Pretty HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 11:42:27 GMT Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Length: 12746 Connection: keep-alive X-Xss-Protection: 1; mode=block X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff X-Request-ID: 65403d71e8745d5e1fe205f44d531 Content-Length: 12746
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>
Admin Panel
</title>
- A. Open URL Redirection
- B. Server-Side Request Forgery
- C. HTTP Desync Attack
- D. File Path Traversal Attack
Correct Answer: B 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for PracticeVCE members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
Observe the HTTP request below and identify the vulnerability attempted.
GET /help.php?file=../../../etc/passwd HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:107.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/107.0 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-GB,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1 Sec-Fetch-Dest: document Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate Sec-Fetch-Site: none Sec-Fetch-User: ?1 Cookie: JSESSIONID=38RB5ECV10785B53AF29816E92E2E50 Te: trailers Connection: keep-alive
- A. All of the above
- B. Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
- C. Path Traversal Vulnerability
- D. Code Injection Vulnerability
Correct Answer: C 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for PracticeVCE members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
In the context of a Dependency Confusion Attack, which of the following files is analyzed for determining potential private packages?
- A. requirements.txt
- B. None of the above
- C. package.json
- D. Both A and B
Correct Answer: D 🗳️
Explanation: Only visible for PracticeVCE members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).
Viewing page 1 out of 12 pages.
Viewing questions 1-5 out of 60 questions.

1325 Customer Reviews
